Thirteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution

Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
Section 2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
Slavery is the social or de-facto status of specific persons, known as slaves who are under the control of another person. Historically, slavery has generally occurred as a means of securing the labour of the slave, without the right of the slave to refuse, leave or receive anything in return for their labour other than food, accommodation and clothing. As such slavery is one form of unfree labour. A specific form of slavery, known as chattel slavery, is defined by the absolute legal ownership of a person or persons, including the legal right to buy and sell them.

A slave woman might produce children from a chosen partner on her own or another plantation; be "assigned" another slave as a sexual partner; and/or produce children by her master or other white men. In any case, she was not always allowed to keep her own children, and if she had a "husband" (not legal by white law), he could not provide for or protect the members of his family.

As a black woman denied employment for several years, my intellectual property was confiscated and used for the profit of others via the electronic surveillance of my home ( a form of slavery, though slavery has been abolished in the United States), and when I observed excerpts from my songs, poems, and articles appearing in the media (radio and television programs) without my consent or compensation and reported the piracy to the authorities, I was ignored or accused of being mentally ill. I have been approached while homeless and in my housing, in my work place, by strangers suggesting that I engage in sexual relations with someone, using sexually explicit language in my presence, or interrogating me about my sexual habits or preferences. As I continued to ignore these individuals and their inappropriate remarks, I was, for a period of several weeks, subjected to psychological torture in my home and work place, the use of repeated, loud, banging noises where I lived and where I worked, occurring for several hours or even days, depriving me of sleep and causing severe headaches. Upon leaving my rented room during one of the torture sessions, which were being viewed by those who had my room under electronic surveillance, a vehicle pulled up in front of my hotel, slowed down, and a recording of someone repeatedly stating, “I want to F*** you” was played loudly. This is the stalking, sexual harassment, and attempted coercion into prostitution of a black woman, occurring in her work place, in her home, and in her community, a racial and gender stereotype of a black woman that should be immediately stopped and those involved investigated and prosecuted. A black woman is not a slave or a prostitute.


Hollywood – D.C.: A Tale of Two Cities

Kenneth Bowser and Rachel Talbot's documentary explores the century-long relationship between the federal government and the movie industry. For politicians in Washington, that relationship has nursed an ever-growing sophistication about the power of media to shape national opinion. From enlisting stars to promote the sale of war bonds to...

For the past three months, I have been subjected to psychological torture (loud banging noises repeated for hours in my work place and in my rental housing), accompanied by the names of characters in films that have murdered women, names of persons in real life who have murdered women and children, names of my family members, names of person in the entertainment industry (film and music), and names of government officials repeated in my presence as I was being tortured, verbally abused, or physically attacked or threatened in my work place and in my rental housing. The psychological torture and use of the names of characters in films who have murdered women, and specific references made in my presence to scenes in films where women were being murdered, persons appearing wherever I go in the community where I live accompanied by white dogs or black and white dogs on leashes, persons in my community approaching me or in my immediate vicinity using the word “dog” or “monkey”, or “horse” or other animals in my presence repeatedly, are, I believe, deliberate attempts to utilize films, references to films depicting acts of violence against women, and references to animals in a black woman’s presence repeatedly, to dehumanize, denigrate, threaten the life of, harass, and to justify and continue the psychological torture and other atrocities against a black woman in America in retaliation for her writing and publicizing songs, poems, and articles about political, social, racial, and gender issues that were viewed as a threat to those in political and economic power.


Dehumanization is the psychological process of demonizing the enemy, making them seem less than human and hence not worthy of humane treatment. This can lead to increased violence, human rights violations, war crimes, and genocide.

Dehumanization is a process by which members of a group of people assert the "inferiority" of another group through subtle or overt acts or statements. Dehumanization may be directed by an organization (such as a state) or may be the composite of individual sentiments and actions, as with some types of de facto racism. State-organized dehumanization has been directed against perceived racial or ethnic groups, nationalities (or "foreigners" in general), religious groups, sexes, sexual minorities, disabled people as a class, economic and social classes, and many other groups.


Use of propaganda against an enemy, supported by whatever military, economic, or political measures are required, and usually intended to demoralize an enemy or to win it over to a different point of view. Strategic psychological warfare is mass communications directed to a very large audience or over a considerable expanse of territory;

As a result of the ongoing psychological torture I experienced for three months in my home and in my work place, I experienced severe headaches and migraines that I discussed with a co-worker on a recent job, even asking her about the possibility of my having a stroke as a result of the severe headaches. Within the next two days, after I left my hotel room because I could no longer endure the psychological torture tactics I was being subjected to, and am now homeless, a story was released via the cable news networks and the national newspapers describing the medical condition of a senator whose first name, “Tim” was the same first name used by the man who raped me at gunpoint a year ago while I was homeless after I contacted an organization in Washington, D.C. to request an investigation into the retaliatory acts committed against me in retaliation for my speech. The news reports described the senator, “Tim”, as having a stroke, possible bleeding of his brain, and other descriptions of a person who is experiencing a stroke or trauma to the brain. I don’t find it coincidental that my home is under surveillance, I am being psychologically tortured for a period of three months, that I discussed with a co-worker at in Medford, OR the symptoms I was experiencing as a result of the torture, and the possibility that I was having a mild stroke, and that the next day, a story came out in the news using the first name of a man who raped me and details provided in the news story of the same conversation I had with a co-worker about my medical condition as a result of being tortured. Yet, for the past several years, despite my requests to various media organizations to publicize my story, that I was being tortured and other crimes committed against me in retaliation for my speech, I was ignored.

"There is no such thing, at this date of the world's history, in America, as an independent press. You know it and I know it. There is not one of you who dares to write your honest opinions, and if you did, you know beforehand that it would never appear in print…The business of the journalists is to destroy the truth; to lie outright; to pervert; to vilify; to fawn at the feet of mammon, and to sell his country and his race for his daily bread. You know it and I know it, and what folly is this toasting an independent press? We are the tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are the jumping jacks, they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our possibilities, and our lives are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes."


QUALIFIED IMMUNITY - The defense of qualified immunity protects "government officials . . . from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known." Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 818 (1982). The rule of qualified immunity " `provides ample support to all but the plainly incompetent or those who knowingly violate the law.' " Burns v. Reed, 500 U.S. 478, 494-95 (1991) (quoting Malley v. Briggs, 475 U.S. 335, 341 (1986)).
Insanity, or madness, is a general term for a semi-permanent, severe mental disorder. The concept has been used in a number of ways historically. Today it is most commonly encountered as a generic informal term, or in the more narrow legal context of criminal insanity. In the medical profession, it is nowadays avoided in favor of specific diagnoses of mental illness.
Violence is any act of aggression and abuse which causes or intends to cause injury, in some cases criminal, or harm to persons, and (to a lesser extent) animals or property.[1] The term "violence" also connotes an aggressive tendency to act out destructive behaviours. Violence can also be divided into two forms — random violence, which includes unpremeditated or small-scale violence, and coordinated violence, which includes actions carried out by sanctioned or unsanctioned violent groups —such as war (ie. inter-societal violence), in some cases certain types of revolution, or terrorism.

Because I have written in my songs, poems, articles about political, social, gender, and racial issues affecting me and others in our society, and the electronic surveillance of my home, stalking, enslavement, sexual harassment, death threats, physical attacks, arbitrary arrests, and psychological torture I have suffered for the past nine years began at the point when I began writing about and publicizing these issues, it is only reasonable to assume that the atrocities I began to and continue to suffer were and are a direct result of the political policies and/or figures I wrote about, under my constitutionally protected right to free speech. This indicates that someone in the government, perhaps someone I wrote about or someone connected to someone I wrote about, initiated the atrocities against me in retaliation for my speech, due to their intolerance of my right to free speech, and the possibility that the government official (s) and/or those connected to them and engaged in the conspiracy against me are mentally incompetent to hold their office. Reacting to an American citizen exercising her right to free speech by having her raped, tortured, stalked, sexually harassed, beaten, electronically surveilled in her home, enslaved by confiscating her intellectual property via the electronic surveillance, and attempts to coerce her into prostitution, I believe demonstrate a person or persons who are mentally incompetent. Anyone in the government, committing such atrocities and/or recruiting others to commit such atrocities, is obviously not competent to continue in their office, as their office is being used to carry out racially and gender motivated crimes and violations of an American citizen’s rights in retaliation for her speech. Due to the fact that for the past nine years, during and after an attack upon me, including armed rape, torture, physical assault, sexual harassment, enslavement, and stalking, the person or persons committing the act against me spoke the name of a government official and/or a famous person in my presence could be an indication that someone in the government, or someone connected to the government, who is mentally incompetent, may be responsible for the atrocities committed against me, and should probably, if ever investigated, be evaluated for their mental capacity to continue in their position, and if deemed incompetent, removed, to prevent the official (s) from engaging in any further conspiracies to recruit others to commit crimes and atrocities against other American citizens in retaliation for their speech, or to use their position in the government to illegally profit from the labor of an American citizen without just compensation to the citizen, or to try to coerce the citizen into criminal acts, like prostitution, for the profit of others. While it is not against the law or illegal to hate, fear, or be intolerant of persons due to their race, gender, socioeconomic status, political persuasion, orientation, disability, or other status, it is illegal to act upon, either directly or as part of a conspiracy, violent, sexually deviant, criminal, potentially harmful and fatal acts upon an American citizen in retaliation for their speech or due to intolerance of the person’s race, gender, socioeconomic status, orientation, disability, or political persuasion.

Dystopia: A futuristic, imagined universe in which oppressive societal control and the illusion of a perfect society are maintained through corporate, bureaucratic, technological, moral, or totalitarian control. Dystopias, through an exaggerated worst-case scenario, make a criticism about a current trend, societal norm, or political system.
Characteristics of a Dystopian Society
• Propaganda is used to control the citizens of society.
• Information, independent thought, and freedom are restricted.
• A figurehead or concept is worshipped by the citizens of the society.
• Citizens are perceived to be under constant surveillance.
• Citizens have a fear of the outside world.
• Citizens live in a dehumanized state.
• The natural world is banished and distrusted.
• Citizens conform to uniform expectations. Individuality and dissent are bad.
• The society is an illusion of a perfect utopian world.

The conflict-of-interest definition—use of public office for personal gain, usually money—is a third aspect of political corruption. This is an ethical issue dealing with the premise that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Corruption, therefore, is a catchall expression for illegal as well as ethically questionable behaviors. Ironically, the very nature of federalism contributed to the potential for corruption. Since power corrupts, the challenge is to require accountability at all levels of government and to create virtuous and ethical citizens.

If we are going to restrict civil liberties in the name of national and homeland security, it is more important than ever to shine the light on these provisions and make sure they can withstand a rigorous test.
Forfeiting civil liberties is not merely an inconvenience for our citizens. It must be a conscious decision, made with full disclosure and review and for good reason. If this forfeiture cannot withstand a review where proponents and opponents have their concerns aired, then our citizens cannot be expected to give up rights they were born with and for which our forefathers and foremothers so desperately fought.

For the past nine years, strangers have been given the legal right to view me in the privacy of my home via electronic surveillance as I eat, sleep, bathe, dress and undress and conduct other activities. As a survivor of physical and sexual assault and abuse as a child and an adult, I cannot adequately describe the emotions of fear and trepidation for my safety and life as I enter a home where I am watched by strangers, and the subsequent stalking, descriptions by strangers of what I had just said or done in my home, sexual harassment, threats of bodily harm and murder, physical attacks, and attempts to engage me in prostitution that have been perpetrated against me by those legally allowed to surveill me in my home in retaliation by the government for my constitutionally protected right to free speech. This is a gender based, politically motivated crime against me that I hope to make the public aware of to halt this governmental action against me and protect other Americans’ right to free speech without fear of government retaliation.

Violence against women persists in every country in the world as a pervasive violation of human rights and a major impediment to achieving gender equality. (U.N. Secretary General's study on violence against women, October 2006).

Every day and everywhere women are killed in sex-related crimes and just for the sake of being women. In recent years, women’s movements from different countries have been denouncing femicides, a concept that aims at accounting for the specific nature of these crimes as well as for their being sexist crimes. "The same as with the concept of violence towards women, this concept has been coined as a result of new approaches, a new understanding of practices that are not new at all. While the concept of sexist violence has been used for several decades, the concept of femicide is more recent: it questions those arguments that tend to excuse perpetrators and consider them as being ‘crazy’ or to regard these murders as ‘passionate crimes’, or else to undermine their importance in the case of conflict or war situations, as if these contexts by themselves could be justifying the violation of the most elementary social rules." (Silvia Chejter, "Femicidios e impunidad", 2005)

Violence against women is recognized as a human rights violation in many agreements and international and regional treaties and national commitments, which should be useful as tools and real guarantees to work towards the prevention of these crimes.

For the past several years, I have been subjected to psychological torture (loud banging noises repeated for hours in my work place and/or in my rental housing), accompanied by the names of characters in films that have murdered women, names of persons in real life who have murdered women and children, names of my family members, names of persons in the entertainment industry (film and music), and names of government officials repeated in my presence as I was being tortured, verbally abused, or physically attacked or threatened in my work place and in my rental housing. According to the Human Subject Research Protections Act,, government officials can target a member (s) of a vulnerable population group for a biomedical, behavioral, or psychological research study, without consent, and the research cannot be stopped, despite the potential harm or fatality to the research subject (s) or others as a result of the classified status of the government authorized study, for the purpose, according to the Act, of furthering a political policy and/or agenda. I believe that due to my status as a racial and gender minority, who has expressed political, social, racial, and gender views critical of or questioning government policies, that I have been targeted by someone in the government for a behavioral/psychological research study designed to induce my into a mental state of violence and/or harm against myself or others, possibly to have me arrested and incarcerated to silence my right to free speech, or even to induce me into behaviors that would lead to my being killed.

Mind control is a general term for a number of controversial theories and/or techniques designed to manipulate an individual's thinking, behavior, emotions, or decisions.

One of the areas to be investigated by the CIA was mind control. The CIA’s human behavior control program was chiefly motivated by perceived Soviet, Chinese, and North Korean use of mind control techniques. Under the protection of ‘national security,’ many other branches of the government also took part in the study of this area. The CIA originated its first program in 1950 under the name BLUEBIRD, which in 1951, after Canada and Britain had been included, was changed to ARTICHOKE. MKULTRA officially began in 1953. [9] Technically it was closed in 1964, but some of its programs remained active under MKSEARCH well into the 1970s. In 1973, tipped off about forthcoming investigations, CIA Director Richard Helms ordered the destruction of any MKULTRA records. MC 10, 17
Diligent use of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) helps to cast light on the advances that have been made in controlling the way people think and act.
A declassified CIA document dated 7 January 1953 [1] with a section heading “Outline of Special H Cases” describes the experimental creation of multiple personality in two 19-year old girls by the CIA. “H” is used as shorthand for hypnotic, hypnotized, or hypnotism in these documents: “These subjects have clearly demonstrated that they can pass from a fully awake state to a deep H controlled state by telephone, by receiving written matter, or by the use of code, signal, or words, and that control of those hypnotized can be passed from one individual to another without great difficulty. It has also been shown by experimentation with these girls that they can act as unwilling couriers for information purposes.” BB 32

I am currently homeless and unemployed due to the activities committed against me in my work place and rental housing that prevented me for health reasons, from continuing to work or live in environments where I was being psychologically tortured and behaviorally manipulated. I am asking the public for help to expose and have investigated those responsible for these atrocities against me, so that I can obtain and maintain affordable housing and employment without further harmful acts committed against me. I am also seeking an investigation into those responsible for the armed rape, arbitrary arrests and incarcerations, electronic surveillance of my home, stalking, physical assaults, and death threats against me, occurring for the past nine years, and to retain my right to free speech as an American citizen, songwriter, poet, and independent journalist, without fear of reprisals by anyone in the government or connected to the government in retaliation for my speech.

Thank you,

Madeline Whyte